About SharpCheck
Football tipster research
SharpCheck researches football (soccer) tipsters, handicappers and betting tools before you pay for a service or follow its bets. We look at published results, the odds followers could get, and reports from people who have used the service.
Our coverage is football only. For services covering several sports, we separate football results and feedback from racing, tennis and other markets.
A profitable record is a starting point. You still need to know what it covers, how it was recorded and whether you could have placed the same bets.
What our research checks
Our tipster research profiles link to the records and reviews behind each assessment. They show when we checked the sources and which service and period the evidence covers. A tipster's personal betting history may differ from the selections sent to paying subscribers.
- Results: bet history, stakes, odds, profit, losses and gaps in the record.
- Verification: evidence that selections were published before the event, and whether changes can be traced.
- Following the bets: bookmaker access, price movements, timing and accepted stakes.
- Subscriber experience: dated feedback about a named service, with any commercial relationship disclosed where known.
A public spreadsheet makes a record inspectable. It does not, by itself, prove that every bet was recorded in advance or that the quoted odds were available. We label figures reported by a service separately from our own calculations and explain what remains unchecked.
Research, not a public vote
SharpCheck is a repository of AI-assisted research from public records, websites and social media. We check original sources, date the evidence and distinguish operator claims, follower reports and verified observations.
We do not accept customer review submissions or star ratings. Friends, rivals and coordinated campaigns can distort public voting. External comments are included as attributed evidence, with context and limitations; they do not become scores.
AI helps find and organise material. It can miss information or make mistakes, so original sources matter. Checks are periodic, not continuous or exhaustive.
What the evidence cannot tell you
Our research profiles carry no composite score or competitive ranking. Readers can inspect the sources and the limits of each assessment.
External reviews are attributed to their source and period. A complaint is not a proven finding, and a positive review is not proof of a lasting betting edge. When we cannot establish something, we say so.
Recorded returns may exclude subscription fees and differ from a follower's returns. Past profit does not guarantee future results.
Editorial standards
Some services and analysts covered have commercial or personal connections to SharpCheck. Profiles are sourced editorial assessments, not independent testing or endorsements. We link the evidence and distinguish published claims from verified observations.
SharpCheck does not earn affiliate commission from bookmakers or tipster services, and tipsters cannot pay for a listing, a feature or a higher ranking.
Read the research
Start with Mark O'Haire, Gaffa or Macca Value Bets. Each profile separates the results, the checks made and the questions still open.
Last updated