Research profiles / Gaffa / Full profile

Gaffa

@touchesinthebox · Public betting record

Gaffa’s public spreadsheet contains 7,403 settled rows across ten tabs. The assessed figures reconcile within the sheet, but that does not verify publication times, obtainable odds or subscriber returns.

By SharpCheck · Published 2026-09-18 · Updated 2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z · Sources checked 2026-09-18 · Research methods

All sections are shown below. Return to tabbed profile.

Key facts

Recorded profit and loss: +311.6515u from 8,137.5105u staked: 3.83% ROI, including pushes. Checked 18 September 2026; this is an internal spreadsheet reconciliation. Public results spreadsheet
Record scope: The combined record includes a separate 2024 props tab and mixed sports in 2018–19. It should not be described as one football-only sample. Source tabs and history
2026 snapshot: 730 settled rows through 6 September 2026 show +33.69u and 4.99% ROI. Pre-bet publication and follower price access remain unverified. 2026 results tab

Evidence

Evidence assessment

Detailed record.
Independent proof still missing.

Recorded profit reconciles to the bet rows. Publication timing, completeness and achievable prices have not been independently established.

Bet-level history

Inspected

7,403 settled rows across ten record tabs, including the separate 2024 player-props tab. Row-level profit totals match the all-time summary.

Losing periods remain visible

Positive evidence

2020 and 2023 losses, and the losing 2024 props record, are included in the aggregate. This supports transparency within the supplied record.

Pre-event publication

Not verified

A typed “Posted Date” is not an immutable timestamp. Original posts, revisions and omitted selections have not been reconciled.

Date consistency

Clarification needed

Three rows in the 2024 tab are dated 29 December 2025. Annual results below retain the source’s tab allocation.

Exact cells and treatment

2024!A13:B15. These are a data-quality question, not evidence of dishonesty. No dates were silently corrected or reassigned.

Results

These are the spreadsheet’s recorded returns. Odds availability, actual placements and follower costs have not been audited. All-time results include non-soccer bets in the early years.

Every annual record, including the losses

Source tab	Rows	Profit	ROI*
2018	473	+59.46u	+10.01%
2019	652	+67.02u	+8.68%
2020	763	−2.16u	−0.25%
2021	709	+42.88u	+5.05%
2022	1,056	+57.29u	+4.58%
2023	995	−4.82u	−0.41%
2024	908	+35.67u	+4.06%
2024-Player Props	114	−4.25u	−8.54%
2025	1,003	+26.87u	+2.60%
2026	730	+33.69u	+4.99%

*SharpCheck calculation: recorded profit ÷ all recorded stakes, including pushes. The source’s 2018–2020 annual ROI excludes pushed stakes, so its displayed percentages differ. 2024 props are shown separately and included once in all-time totals.

Reconciliation method

Read-only workbook export. Count rows with a match and numeric settled P/L; sum their stake and P/L fields across 2018–2026 and 2024-Player Props. Exclude All Time and Current Yr Rolling from row aggregation to avoid double counting. Profit: 311.6515u; stakes: 8137.5105u. This checks internal arithmetic, not real-world settlement correctness. Half wins and half losses count as one row each.

Recorded spreadsheet results: all-time mixed scope, 7,403 settled rows, +311.65u on 8,137.51u staked (3.83% ROI); 2026 through 6 September, 730 settled rows, +33.69u on 674.63u staked (4.99% ROI). Includes pushes in turnover.

Followability

Practical evidence

Recorded odds need an execution check

“Units” can differ from money at risk

The latest row labels a selection 1 unit at American odds −128, with 1.28 units in the Stake field. ROI uses the stake at risk. A follower needs the staking convention made explicit.

Closing-line data exists for part of the history

446 of 709 rows in 2021 contain a closing-line field. Its accuracy and comparability have not been audited; no blanket closing-line-value claim is made.

Prices and bookmaker access

The recent ledger lists odds and stakes, but does not establish how long prices lasted, which followers could obtain them, or accepted bet limits.

Timing and completeness

Link original public selections to tracker rows, then check publication before kickoff and retain a history of edits and deletions.

A specific warning against chasing a shorter price

On 16 July 2026, Gaffa followed his Toronto +0.5 selection at −132 with a warning that it was no longer a 1.75-unit play at −150/−160. He suggested alternative combinations around even money. Those combinations are different bets, not equivalent replacements.

The original conversation shows him responding to a price move; it does not measure how many followers obtained the first price or their stakes. Selection, odds warning and replies ↗

Reviews

Public feedback research

Insufficient attributable review evidence

Focused searches for Gaffa and @touchesinthebox did not identify a substantive independent following trial or documented complaint suitable for this profile.

Positive evidence we can support

A lengthy public ledger with odds, stakes and losses available to inspect. Its aggregate profit and stakes reconcile. These are observations about the record, not customer endorsements.

Limitations we can support

No independent timestamp audit, follower-price trial or verified review sample established. Three date inconsistencies need clarification. None of these findings alone demonstrates abuse.

Avoid a mistaken identity

Search results also contain an older “Gaffa Tips” service. Its reviews are excluded because no link to @touchesinthebox was established.

No qualifying review found does not mean no complaints exist. Search visibility is incomplete. Likes, retweets and casual praise do not become verified customer reviews.