Research profiles / Harley / Full profile

Harley

@HarIeeyy · Football cards, props and corners · Price access and published results

Harley’s tracker reports substantial cumulative profits. A 2024 customer described fast price moves and heavy volume; 2026 operator posts describe a revised approach, but current follower price access remains unmeasured.

By SharpCheck · Published · Updated · Sources checked · Research methods

All sections are shown below. Return to tabbed profile.

Key facts

Recorded profit and loss
17,651 displayed bets, +2,124.14u and 18.77% reported ROI across July 2020–October 2026, checked 15 October. The cumulative record spans changes in method. Public results tracker
Historical follower experience
A June 2024 reviewer rated the service 4/5 but left, describing rapid price moves, high volume and bookmaker account difficulties. This is one unverified customer account. Original dated review
Newer approach
In March 2026 Harley described tips within 24 hours of kickoff, props at lineups and advised minimum prices. His accessibility estimate has not been independently measured. Operator’s 2026 explanation

Evidence

Strong published returns.
What price can followers actually get?

Harley has a long public results record. A dated customer review describes difficulty matching prices and managing the volume. More recent operator posts describe changes intended to improve access. Both matter: the historical complaint should not be treated as a measurement of today’s service, and the newer claims still need independent checking.

Public record

Accessible; not independently audited

Bettin.gs displayed 17,651 bets, +2,124.14u and 18.77% ROI when checked on 15 October 2026. Its date range ran from 14 July 2020 to 14 October 2026. Inspect the public tracker. These are published tracker figures, not verified subscriber returns.

Price-access concern

Historical subscriber report

A June 2024 reviewer praised the results but described rapid price moves, heavy volume and difficulty maintaining bookmaker accounts. The report is relevant to followability, but the underlying account and execution records have not been inspected. Read the original review.

A newer approach

Operator’s 2026 claims

Harley says tips are released within 24 hours of kickoff, props are taken at lineups as bet builders rather than singles, and minimum prices are advised. He also says many bets are available across multiple bookmakers. Read the 2 March 2026 explanation. We have not independently measured how often followers obtain the recorded or minimum prices.

Our assessment: there is a documented historical concern about following at advertised prices, alongside a newer claimed change in approach. The missing evidence is a subscriber execution study comparing advised prices, obtainable prices and returns after fees.

Results

Published tracker snapshot

Checked 15 October 2026 · Displayed range 14 July 2020–14 October 2026

Recorded bets17,651
Recorded profit+2,124.14u
Reported ROI18.77%

Displayed turnover: 11,314.54u. Average stake: 0.64u. Bet365 is listed as the top bookmaker and football as the top sport. The average-odds field displayed an invalid value, so no average price is reproduced here. Inspect the public tracker.

These figures come from Harley’s public tracker. We have not audited the full ledger against original selections, edit timestamps, bookmaker receipts or subscriber outcomes. The cumulative record may span changes in method; it should not be treated as a trial of the current approach alone.

2025/26 season

Operator-reported figures

Harley’s 28 May 2026 post reports 2,496 bets, +263.3u and 19.47% ROI, with a 0.54u average stake. Read the 28 May 2026 season report. These season figures have not been independently reconciled to the cumulative tracker; the two totals must not be added together.

Minimum price is not the recorded price

A bet can remain above its minimum acceptable price while offering less than the price used in the published record. Following exactly the same winning selections at lower odds reduces returns. We do not have a separate performance record calculated at all advised minimum prices or at prices actually taken by subscribers.

Followability

Odds, timing and account access

June 2024 · Early bets and fast moves

Customer report

The reviewer johndeardon describes early selections, fast-moving odds, days with more than 30 bets and difficulty keeping bookmaker accounts usable. They rated the service 4/5 despite leaving. This is one dated account, not a representative survey or a current volume estimate. Read the original review.

March 2026 · Fresh lines

Operator acknowledges older practice

Harley says he took freshly opened lines around three years earlier, but argues that prices held better and accounts lasted longer then. He says the landscape changed and accessibility should now take priority. Read his reply. This acknowledges an older method; it does not independently confirm how attainable those prices were.

Lineups and bet builders

Published 2026 approach

His March post says all tips are posted less than 24 hours before kickoff and props are taken on lineups as bet builders only. He says many card bets become available across several bookmakers, sometimes Pinnacle, and Bet365-exclusive props often remain above the advised minimum long enough to follow. Read the 2 March 2026 explanation.

He claims more than 90% of bets are accessible and manageable. That is his estimate, not an independent measurement. The May season report repeats the claim that bets were available at multiple bookmakers or held above minimum prices. Read the 28 May 2026 season report.

What would verify access?

Not yet measured

A useful following trial would record receipt time, advised odds, minimum odds, prices available after 30 seconds, two minutes and five minutes, and stakes actually accepted. Results should distinguish bets missed, bets taken at reduced prices, subscription fees and account restrictions.

Service scope and fees

Current terms unconfirmed

Betting Kingdom’s historical profile distinguishes the main service from an in-play goal-line service. We have not confirmed current fees or availability, or established that the newer accessibility claims apply to both services. Main-service and in-play results should not be combined without checking their scope.

Reviews

External feedback

External comments are shown with their dates and context. They are not SharpCheck user reviews and do not change the community score.

johndeardon · 5 June 2024

Betting Kingdom · 4/5

The reviewer was positive about returns but found the workload and price access difficult, and reported problems keeping accounts usable. Their experience supports a followability concern; it does not establish that the recorded results are false. Read the original review.

Chrispop82 · 1 November 2023

Betting Kingdom · 5/5

This reviewer strongly praised the service and free selections, while describing difficulty getting a place in the group. No supporting subscriber records were inspected. Read the original review.

Harley · March and May 2026

Operator response to the broader issue

Harley explicitly discusses odds accessibility and describes changes in timing, markets and minimum-price guidance. These posts provide relevant current context, but are not identified as a direct response to the 2024 reviewer. Read the 2 March 2026 explanation. Read the 28 May 2026 season report.

Waiting-list reports on X

Access to membership

On 28 May 2026, @jonvalverde10 said they had been waiting for years while already belonging to the Live group. Read the comment. This concerns access to a group, not proof about odds availability once admitted.

Limits of the feedback

We found no substantive attributable Reddit review in the indexed searches used for this assessment. General complaints about prop tipsters are not evidence about Harley. The dated customer reports and newer operator statements do not settle how closely an ordinary subscriber can reproduce the headline return today.