Lulas BTTS
Football service, public results and follower price evidence
Research snapshot · 17 October 2026 · Evidence assessment, not a recommendation
A high-volume BTTS No service with public monthly results since February 2022. The operator acknowledges lower follower odds; minimum-price returns and subscriber profit remain unverified.
By SharpCheck · Published 17 October 2026 · Edited 17 October 2026 · Research methods
Lulas BTTS review: the key facts
| Public record | Monthly P/L since February 2022, including losing periods. Complete bet-level reconciliation remains outstanding. Tipstrr public statistics |
|---|---|
| Current fee | £29 monthly; eligible introductory month £11.60, then automatic renewal. Checked 17 October 2026. Membership and results page |
| Following prices | The operator acknowledges lower available odds and gives minimum prices. Returns achieved at those minimums have not been established. Operator description |
Service and evidence
What Lulas BTTS covers
Lulas BTTS specialises in pre-match both teams to score: No. Its Tipstrr history starts in February 2022. The overview showed roughly 71 tips a week on 17 October 2026, making this a service with a substantial workload. Operator description ↗
A public record, with a boundary
Tipstrr provides public performance summaries and monthly history, including losing months. Individual result details prompted a free-account login in the inspected signed-out view. SharpCheck has not reconciled the complete selection ledger or tested the service as a subscriber. Results access ↗
Public profit and loss
Recent closed months
At the selected £10 level-stakes setting, Tipstrr lists June 2026 −£438.15, July +£304.60, August +£485 and September −£482.75. These are platform-recorded results, inspected 17 October 2026, before a separate allowance for membership costs. They show why a profitable long record should not be mistaken for steady monthly income. Monthly P/L ↗
Read the period before the percentage
The statistics page defaults to the last three months for its bookmaker, league and timing breakdowns. That sample includes club friendlies and lower divisions in Norway, Sweden and Finland. It is not the whole history since 2022. Neither a platform profit figure nor a bookmaker quote establishes the price and stake a subscriber obtained. Statistics and period controls ↗
Following the service
The operator explicitly discusses lower odds
Lulas says members may find prices below those quoted and supplies recommended minimum odds. That is relevant guidance, but it does not show the return at those minimum prices. A useful following trial would record release time, advised odds, available odds, accepted stake and skipped selections. Minimum-odds explanation ↗
Bookmaker access and workload
The recent statistics name Betfair and Spreadex most often. The Betfair label alone does not establish exchange liquidity or commission treatment. Around 71 tips a week also makes missed selections a practical consideration; following only part of the list changes the result. Bookmaker and timing breakdowns ↗
Subscription checked 17 October 2026
The public offer was £29 per month, with an £11.60 introductory month for eligible new members, followed by automatic renewal at £29. Prices and offers can change. Current membership offer ↗
External reviews and unresolved questions
Dated X feedback: time commitment and improving form
On 28 February 2025, Tips on Tipsters said Lulas was finding form again but that they did not have time to follow it. On 31 March they praised its recovery after an inconsistent end to 2024 and said they planned to rejoin. The latter post includes a promotional link. These are historical observations from one account, not two independent trials or proof of current price access. February post ↗ · March post and replies ↗
Positive external editorial coverage
Tipster Reviews gives a favourable assessment and describes the demands of handling a large number of tips. Its joining link uses a referral identifier, so the recommendation has a commercial context. SharpCheck has not verified the author’s personal betting results. External review ↗
The question that remains
How much of the recorded profit survives lower odds, missed bets and membership fees? The public monthly record helps establish performance history; a dated subscriber execution log is still needed to answer that question.