Oli Nixon
Football props · Oli Nixon VIP · Formerly part of AMOK
Research snapshot · 17 October 2026 · Evidence assessment, not a recommendation
Oli Nixon’s standalone VIP service has a public bet-level tracker. Its recorded profit is inspectable, but full publication history and follower prices remain unverified; older AMOK reviews predate this service.
By SharpCheck · Published 15 October 2026 · Edited 17 October 2026 · Research methods
Oli Nixon review: the key facts
| Recorded profit and loss | 1,769 settled bets, +114.47u and 6.86% reported ROI, checked 17 October 2026. The visible monthly history starts in August 2025; three further bets were pending. Standalone VIP tracker |
|---|---|
| Subscription | £20 monthly or £200 annually on the sales page checked 15 October 2026. Delivery is through Telegram; checkout was not completed. VIP service and pricing |
| Price availability | The operator says only obtainable prices are tracked. The holding-time rule, excluded selections and actual subscriber prices have not been independently checked. Stated tracking policy |
A public bet-level record.
Follower prices still need checking.
Oli’s current VIP service has an accessible tracker showing individual selections, stakes, odds and results. That gives readers more to inspect than a headline return. It does not, by itself, prove that every bet was sent before the event or that subscribers could obtain the recorded price.
Current service
Operator sourceOli announced his standalone VIP service on 30 July 2025 after three years in a team. Older AMOK reviews belong to that earlier context. Read the launch announcement.
Public ledger
AccessibleThe Oli Nixon VIP bankroll opens without signing in. We inspected its totals, statistics and recent rows on 15 October 2026. Inspect the record.
Published analysis
Examples availableHis Oddschecker author page provides free football analysis. Media work demonstrates his approach; it is not an independent audit of the paid service.
Verification limits
Still openWe have not matched the complete tracker to original Telegram messages, checked edit history or measured how long each price stayed available. Recorded profit is not a verified subscriber return.
Current VIP tracker
Bet-Analytix snapshot · 17 October 2026 · Visible monthly history August 2025–October 2026
The statistics panel lists 873 wins and 896 losses, with no refunded bets. Three further bets are pending. Played stakes total 1,668.83u; pending stakes total 3u. It reports an average stake of 0.94u, average odds of 4.788 and a drawdown of 25.61u. Open the public tracker.
Recent months, including losses
The tracker shows September 2026 at +18.57u, August at +11.28u, July at −3.79u and June at −2.54u. October was −2.53u when checked and is an incomplete month. September and August agree with the profit totals in Oli’s public updates.
September update: 176 bets, 11.14% reported ROI · August update: 106 bets, 11.96% reported ROI.
Why other figures differ
The sales page advertises roughly 3,000 tips at about 11% ROI. Oddschecker’s biography quotes 2,300 tracked bets at 11%; FIRST’s biography quotes over 2,500 bets at 13%. These are published claims with different sample sizes and unclear common cut-off dates. They are not interchangeable with this VIP tracker.
Oddschecker biography · FIRST biography · Sales page.
In his July 2025 launch thread, Oli directed readers to a different bankroll and told them to filter for “Oli”. We have not reconciled that historical record with the standalone VIP account, and have not combined their returns. Original explanation.
Timing, prices and the cost of following
After team news
Operator statementHis September 2026 update says selections were taken after team news and only tracked where prices held. This makes availability part of the record’s inclusion rule, rather than proof that every subscriber could get on. Read the update.
Which prices count?
Needs detailThe current sales page likewise says only obtainable prices are tracked. The useful next checks are how long a price must hold, the minimum acceptable odds, and whether excluded selections are logged consistently before results are known. Stated tracking policy.
Bookmaker access
Practical constraintFollowers need access to the named bookmakers and the relevant prop markets. A profitable record cannot establish an individual account’s stake limits. Bets after team news can also require attention close to kick-off; no measured response-time window was established in this check.
Membership capacity
Historical statementAt launch in July 2025, Oli said membership was not capped but that he would cap it if needed to protect price availability. We have not established the current cap or subscriber count. Launch reply.
Renewal and cancellation
Published termsThe terms say subscriptions renew until cancelled. Cancellation stops the next charge while access continues to the end of the paid period; refund requests go to the seller. Read the terms.
External reviews and public feedback
These are attributed summaries from other platforms. They do not add votes to SharpCheck’s community score. We have not verified the reviewers’ subscriptions or betting statements.
Eoghan · 11 September 2024
Betting Kingdom · 5/5Praises price discipline, particularly recognising when shortened odds no longer offer value, and considers the service good value. This predates the standalone VIP launch. Read the original review.
milliebicliff · 22 August 2024
Betting Kingdom · 5/5Describes using AMOK and praises Oli’s reasoning, goalscorer work and Propcast contributions. It is a positive account of the earlier group service, not evidence of results since July 2025. Read the original review.
Betting Kingdom’s recommendation
Publisher opinionA 12 October 2024 post included Oli among tipsters used for the site’s Best Bets feature. This is editorial endorsement from the same publisher hosting the reviews, not another independently verified customer result. Read the X post.
Access question · 9 December 2025
Single public reportMarc Terry said he had paid £20 but did not know how to access the service. This establishes an onboarding question, not non-delivery; no outcome was established in the material inspected. Read the original reply.
How much weight to give this
Two positive reviews from 2024 are useful detail, but a small, historical sample. Their ratings cannot establish present-day odds availability or net returns. Targeted web and Reddit searches did not produce a substantive additional Reddit review that we could confidently attribute to this service. That search result is not a clean bill of health or evidence of a problem.
The AMOK Propcast archive provides examples of the group’s analysis and contributors. Podcast ratings concern the show, not audited betting performance.