Profit Tips
@Prof1tTips · Paid football tips on Telegram
Research snapshot · 14 October 2026 · Evidence assessment, not a recommendation
Profit Tips has a linked results tracker and a detailed 2023 following trial. That trial reported a profit alongside declining price capture; it does not establish current performance, fees or access.
By SharpCheck · Published 14 October 2026 · Edited 18 October 2026 · Research methods
Profit Tips review: the key facts
| Historical trial | A September 2023 reviewer reported 9.7% ROI over 262 bets, with a change in staking during the trial. These are reviewer-reported results, not a current audit. Original following trial |
|---|---|
| Price access | The same reviewer reported matching 74% of prices, down from 86%, after bookmaker restrictions. This is one historical follower’s experience. Trial’s odds and account limitations |
| Public profit and loss | Dashboard checked 18 October 2026: 5,974 bets and 12.59% reported ROI. The displayed range ends 20 July 2026; the full ledger and later continuity remain unverified. Linked public tracker |
Betting Kingdom links this service to @Prof1tTips and describes a focus on football props. Its historical listing names a paid Telegram group and a Bettin.gs record.
What this profile establishes
Published customer feedback exists, including a following trial and differing experiences. We have not audited the full selection history or confirmed current subscription terms.
262 bets in one reviewer’s sample
Simon’s review dated 29 September 2023 reports a 9.7% ROI after 262 bets, down from 13% earlier in the trial. He also changed his stake size. These are reviewer-reported figures, not a SharpCheck calculation or a current service return.
Public tracker inspected · 18 October 2026
The linked Bettin.gs dashboard displays 5,974 bets, +£1,142.83 result, £9,076.82 turnover and 12.59% ROI. Its selected date range is 16 December 2019–20 July 2026. These are publisher-displayed amounts, not a SharpCheck ledger audit or a current October return. The currency amounts have not been relabelled as units.
Access to the dashboard is now confirmed. Continuity after the displayed July endpoint, inclusion of every paid selection and actual subscriber prices remain unverified.
Open linked tracker ↗Bookmaker access affects the result
In the same 2023 trial, Simon said the proportion of advised prices he could match fell from 86% to 74%. He linked the problem to increased use of Paddy Power and William Hill, where his bets faced restrictions.
What needs checking now
A current sample should record the bookmaker, price at release, delay before placement, accepted stake and missed bets. These historical percentages describe one follower; they are not a guarantee of current availability.
Positive feedback and a disputed practice
Simon · 29 September 2023
Betting Kingdom · 5/5Remained positive about his following trial while describing a decline in matched prices. His reported figures and account restrictions are set out in the Results and Followability tabs.
Read original review ↗Harley · 21 March 2025
Betting Kingdom · 5/5Said they joined in 2024 and praised the operator for acknowledging difficult results in 2025. They reported a profitable recent week; no supporting account records were inspected.
Read original review ↗skouldt · 31 May 2024
Betting Kingdom · 1/5Alleged that selections were copied without credit, citing a distinctive two-match combination posted later than another tipster’s. We have not inspected the original timestamps, established copying or obtained the operator’s response. This remains an allegation.
Read original review ↗X and Reddit search coverage
Public web searches included the account name and handle on X/Twitter and Reddit on 14 October 2026. No substantive, independently attributable customer review from those platforms was found for this assessment. Direct access to some X pages was blocked. This is a search limitation, not evidence that feedback or complaints do not exist.