Research profiles / Scott Thornton

Scott Thornton

@scottythorn21 · Scott’s Betting Model · Free and paid football tips

Research snapshot · 15 October 2026 · Evidence assessment, not a recommendation

Scott Thornton’s public sheet reports a profitable sample, while his paid props model has separate pricing and delivery terms. The sheet’s period and its relationship to subscriber execution need clarification.

By SharpCheck · Published 15 October 2026 · Edited 18 October 2026 · Research methods

Read full profile on one page

Scott Thornton review: the key facts

Public records and service evidence — dates and limits included
Recorded profit and lossThe sheet shows +112.11u from 1,886.16u staked: 5.94% ROI. Checked 15 October 2026; repeated month labels leave the exact covered period unclear.
Public results sheet
Paid modelAdvertised at £29.99 monthly, £79.99 quarterly or £249.99 annually, and displayed one spot left on 18 October 2026. Availability may change; checkout was not tested.
Model subscription page
Delivery and scopeThe sales page describes near-kickoff selections and more than 100 monthly bets. Free selections and the joint goalscorer service should not be treated as the same paid record.
Paid model description

A public record.
Prices still need scrutiny.

Identity and service

Scott’s X profile ↗ links to his Linktree ↗, which links the paid service and public sheet. His BettingOdds author page ↗ describes a statistical modelling approach. A publishing role establishes professional activity, not audited betting profits.

Free channel and paid model are separate

Scott promoted a free Telegram channel on 1 September 2026 ↗. The paid Scott’s Betting Model ↗ currently advertises team shots, throws, goal kicks, tackles and free kicks, plus Asian handicaps and cards. Its package also lists a joint goalscorer channel with Macca. Results from different channels should not be combined without checking scope.

What this assessment can establish

There is a publicly accessible operator-maintained record and dated discussion of prices moving. We have not followed the service with real accounts or reconciled every subscriber alert against the sheet. No subscriber verification or community rating has been added.

Sources checked 15 October 2026 · External feedback updated 15 October 2026 · No composite scoreOpen primary source ↗