Tipster Charlie

On X since 2011; inspected football rows start in 2022

Charlie’s X profile ↗ says he joined in August 2011. The service website ↗ says it has operated since 2015. Neither date establishes a continuous profit-and-loss record. In the website-linked workbook’s Data tab, dated football rows run from 1 July 2022 to 31 August 2025, across several service labels. That is the coverage of the inspected tab, not proof that no earlier or later records exist.

In a discussion about public profit-and-loss records, Charlie wrote: “I recently reset it” and said the record was open for everyone to view. Read Charlie’s original reply. Read the preceding question about P/L.

This confirms that he acknowledged a reset in that discussion. It does not establish which platform he reset, the balance beforehand, his reason, or whether losses were removed. We have not established a pattern of repeated tracker resets.

A Reddit commenter alleged copying other tipsters’ tweets and deleting losing selections. Another participant disputed that account. Separately, Kyle Benson accused Charlie on X of publishing false results. The linked comments establish that these allegations were made; they do not independently prove them. The Reviews tab includes their wording, context and limitations.

What the linked Data tab contains

We checked its CSV export and filtered rows labelled Football with a date. The earliest was 1 July 2022 and the latest 31 August 2025. Labels include Main/Big Leagues, Small League, Mid Tier Leagues, Corners & Cards, AGS and Euro/Copa Outrights. Other sports are excluded from this assessment. Inspect the Data tab ↗

What that leaves unresolved

The inspected football rows do not provide a continuous record from the 2011 X join date or the website’s stated 2015 service start. They also do not establish current 2026 results. Other tabs, older archives, later records, publication times and amendments have not been fully reconciled. We have not calculated a combined return across these services or treated the workbook’s running total as a verified lifetime result.

The 2016 reset is a separate finding

On 20 November 2016, Charlie acknowledged a recent reset. We have not connected that record to this workbook or established its pre-reset balance, reason or effect on cumulative profit. The later start of the inspected rows does not prove that losses were removed. Original reset reply ↗

Kasper MMA said he ended his subscription because of the commitment involved. In the same conversation he called the service value for money and said he took his profit and left because he no longer wanted to place all the bets. This is evidence of a reported workload concern, not a complaint about dishonesty. Read the full conversation.

Charlie said he had deleted a tip because he had not realised how much the odds had changed. Read his explanation. This is a specific acknowledgement of changed odds and a removed post. It does not establish routine unavailability or deletion after a losing result.

In an r/SoccerBetting discussion, ZuluBaz wrote: “TipsterCharlie literally just screenshots other Tipster's tweets and claims there his own and deletes old tweets of bets that lose”.

Another participant, u/toodrunktofuck, replied that they had not found anything missing from Charlie’s feed or P/L sheet during the period they followed him. That participant had recommended the service and linked its spreadsheet. Neither side supplies supporting screenshots in the visible exchange. Read the allegation and response.

Benson accused Charlie of posting “VERY false results” while referring to an advertised 85% strike rate. Read the original accusation. In a separate post that day, he referred to Charlie’s “true P/L record”. The visible posts do not supply the underlying bet-level calculation or a comparison establishing false reporting.

Benson published a screenshot and attributed its blue messages to Charlie. Those messages discuss recently losing numerous tips. Inspect the post and screenshot. We have not independently authenticated the conversation or its attribution. Even if authentic, acknowledging losses does not demonstrate falsified results. The screenshot’s reference to twelve consecutive losing VIP tips appears in the other participant’s messages, not those attributed to Charlie.

@89_juventus complained of two or three weeks of losses and said “charlie premium” continued after seven losses that day. Read the surviving post. Its parent is deleted, and the surviving text does not tag the service. We cannot conclusively identify the service or verify the figures from this post alone; it is an unresolved lead, not a verified subscriber result.

Charlie acknowledged a recent reset in a public P/L discussion. Read Charlie’s original reply. This is stronger evidence of his own statement than third-party recollections, but does not establish the old balance or prove that losses were concealed.

Eva Tyler alleged continued charges after cancellation requests and pressure to remove critical tweets before a refund. Trustpilot review. A ProductReview complaint under Eva T uses substantially matching wording and appears to describe the same experience. We count this as one apparent complainant, not two independent cases. We have not verified the correspondence, payments or final outcome.